Jump to content

THE VIDEO THREAD!


dpong

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, pico said:

Let's all move to California with zillions Wh Wheels so that @Marty Backe  does not feel alone anymore on those potholes-free lanes! :roflmao:

Who said that Life was fair?

:laughbounce2:

Hey, they are some divots here and there that you have to look out for :P

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Marty Backe said:

Those yellow transformers are for a much beefier DC-DC converter (power baby). The MSP control board is built to better supply the power for the torque-monster of a motor.

Grazie 🙏🏾😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Marty Backe said:

 

Great results 👍 another great video 

 will you be selling your original 84v msx now?

 I think this wheel would be better for me over my 84v as i live in hilly area plus I'm heavier so i could push it more 😁

Lol at the buzzing ,,self destruct 😂

I'm still loving the 16x for riding I've neglected the msx☹️ was going to buy the mten 3 but i might ask msx for msp now😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2020 at 12:43 AM, pico said:

@Marty Backe You are now a chick magnet! Just imagine yourself doing tricks on this thing and your mojo will skyrocket! :roflmao:

@Marty Backe did you show this to your wife ;)?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2020 at 2:48 AM, Marty Backe said:

I appreciate your interest in my mojo :D If only I had your skills, and were single :laughbounce2:

Being single is a easy fix. skills takes more practice...:rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, EMA said:

awesome edit,  phone exported footage for the insta ?

Using the Insta360 One R with the ColorPlus option. I think it enhances the colors but it makes it look like the foreground image (rider) is almost VR or a game. So, I may try it without that next time. I used the Insta360 Studio desktop not phone to reframe and then edit those video in Adobe Premier with a final export to 1920x1080 HD.

I noticed that your videos, which look great by the way, are in 4k but that is actually upscaled as the One X footage doesn't really have that high of resolution, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ZenRyder said:

Using the Insta360 One R with the ColorPlus option. I think it enhances the colors but it makes it look like the foreground image (rider) is almost VR or a game. So, I may try it without that next time. I used the Insta360 Studio desktop not phone to reframe and then edit those video in Adobe Premier with a final export to 1920x1080 HD.

I noticed that your videos, which look great by the way, are in 4k but that is actually upscaled as the One X footage doesn't really have that high of resolution, right?

correct, whatever is the camera resolution 4k upscaling (possibly 60mbit file) before YT upload is mandatory to have a better final product ( because YT will less compress your file )

this time i exported in 4k right out 360studio, next time i'll export @1080p and upscale with premiere, just for reference

 

remember to use shutter on "fastest" when filming with light

Edited by EMA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, EMA said:

correct, whatever is the camera resolution 4k upscaling (possibly 60mbit file) before YT upload is mandatory to have a better final product ( because YT will less compress your file )

Interesting. My earlier videos were done in higher quality and YouTube just crushed them with their compression (quality decreased). What I read was that if you limit it to 10 Mbps, then they won't re-compress it. The advantage there is that it takes a lot less time to export re-framed footage AND a lot less time to upload to YouTube. I will have to try and compare a side by side up-scaled version and then a regular 1080 to see if there is any improvement in quality. If there is not, then up-scaling to higher than HD is just a waste of time and bits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ZenRyder said:

Interesting. My earlier videos were done in higher quality and YouTube just crushed them with their compression (quality decreased). What I read was that if you limit it to 10 Mbps, then they won't re-compress it. The advantage there is that it takes a lot less time to export re-framed footage AND a lot less time to upload to YouTube. I will have to try and compare a side by side up-scaled version and then a regular 1080 to see if there is any improvement in quality. If there is not, then up-scaling to higher than HD is just a waste of time and bits.

You get best results with YouTube by applying the correct compression, not by playing with the quality. Use two-pass variable bit rate compression. This results in higher compression for the elements of each frame that don't move a lot and lower compression for what does (trees, etc.). Upscaling, etc. is a waste of time, IMHO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...