Jump to content

Sherman-S 3600wh: 100V, 20", suspension, 97lb


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, RagingGrandpa said:

Why not?

 

for the same reasons you are explaining that more fets are better I think. For even heat dissipation surface area is important because at those temperatures radiation transfer occurs, the sandwitch approach makes total radiation area smaller, one board radiates to the other. 

but that is if they do continue using small aluminum plate sinks on EUC's. If indeed they go the s18 way (or rockweel or s2, but the s18 is a first at having no heatsink part at all, only the frame) and use the frame that is designed to act as a heat sink, then I agree that sandwich may not be a problem for fanless, but still harder to do I think. 


PS. The sink integration design on the s18 frame, is one of the reasons I do not believe the s18 is an inhouse desigh. Have a  look at it if you have one, you will notice they change angle by 90 degrees right after the fets, so as to radiate to the opposite side of the sink/frame.

Edited by enaon
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jon Wall said:

If this new Sherman s  had $3500 Ohlins/Rockshock/Fox pro level mtb forks on it,  we would all complain about the $7500 price tag. 

But you dont need to spend 3.5k to get decent forks. A brand new set of Rockshox Domains (with current spec 38mm stanchions) are about £450 and they are very capable for 95% of riders, plus easily serviceable so the tech is out there.

I would happily pay £500 extra to get suspension on an euc over a non- suspended version but until a suspension euc comes out with similar quality suspension on par with industry standard mtb levels we are going to continue to see problems. I've lost count of the number of threads with people discussing issues with fixing the S18/S22/Master etc etc. or even having to go as far as replacing linkages/air cans entirely. In fact the 'old' V11 seems to be the most reliable. Until EUC's move away from using bottom rung suspension components and design I'll stick with unsprung wheels.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RagingGrandpa changed the title to Sherman-S 3600wh: 100V, 20", suspension, 97lb
2 hours ago, RagingGrandpa said:

wonder if they'll be brave enough to use one side as the spring, and the other as the damper, like has been the trend for modern MTB forks?

I've been wondering about the same thing. But just like you've also noticed, the bridge between the tubes is very shallow. I also don't think that separate tubes would be a good idea on an EUC, so I hope that they are using symmetrical tubes. Even when it makes you adjust the settings on both sides.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2022 at 12:59 AM, Paul g said:

@chanman I noticed the poor heat dissipation problem can lead to components failure (FETs as well) in many cases so the easier is the cooling the better for me. I also prefer a fanless design over one with a fan. Less FETs with more power will occupy a much smaller area and would automatically lead to fan design in my opinion. For less FETs start using copper heatsinks? Maybe that will be the next step, since 24 FETs seem to have reached a limit. 

The heat dissipation is almost double for copper.

25E83421-B3D5-4EDE-A155-61DD5B89CDC2.thumb.jpeg.2dabeb07ce3114f3268ecf0665f99d07.jpeg

Source: https://www.gabrian.com/copper-vs-aluminum-heatsinks/ 

 

Copper is 3.3 times the density of Al alloy and 4.4 times the price at todays rate (LME). Al has a good set of parametres that is hard to beat. I'm not even sure why LeaperKim is going magnesium on the battery covers. Sure it is lighter but not as strong as Al. I guess it is marketing. I'm sure the covers would be just as strong if they used thinner Al of the same weight. Well if the batteries burn you wont have to worry about the Al covers melting as the Mg will go up like a roman candle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RagingGrandpa said:

Suspension:
I wonder if they'll be brave enough to use one side as the spring, and the other as the damper, like has been the trend for modern MTB forks?

@RagingGrandpa, I guess there is a strong possibility with Leaperkim choosing Fastace to develop the suspension for them (rather than cobbling something together themselves) a version along those lines may well have been adapted/modified for EUC use.

On the Fastace website, their own MTB fork (as currently used on the Sur-ron/Segway e-dirt bikes) is certainly designed that way, so that in itself could signal the possibility of Fastace translating/implementing a specifically designed EUC version for the Sherman-S and IMHO I expect they will have:

 Fastace ALX13RC MTB Bike Front Fork 26 27.5 29 Inch Compatible Double Shoulder Control Downhill Suspension best for Surron Talaria Segway

Edited by fbhb
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DavidB said:

Copper is 3.3 times the density of Al alloy and 4.4 times the price at todays rate (LME). Al has a good set of parametres that is hard to beat. I'm not even sure why LeaperKim is going magnesium on the battery covers. Sure it is lighter but not as strong as Al. I guess it is marketing. I'm sure the covers would be just as strong if they used thinner Al of the same weight. Well if the batteries burn you wont have to worry about the Al covers melting as the Mg will go up like a roman candle.

Well, it is not Mg, It’s Mg alloy actually. It is used in aerospace industry. If it would be Mg it would be a fire hazard since it reacts violently with the O2 in the air. 
Cu is the next step in cooling compared to Al, just like it happens in laptops, for example, though there are differences as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DavidB said:

Copper is 3.3 times the density of Al alloy and 4.4 times the price at todays rate (LME). Al has a good set of parametres that is hard to beat. I'm not even sure why LeaperKim is going magnesium on the battery covers. Sure it is lighter but not as strong as Al. I guess it is marketing. I'm sure the covers would be just as strong if they used thinner Al of the same weight. Well if the batteries burn you wont have to worry about the Al covers melting as the Mg will go up like a roman candle.

We will get a nice sparkler show when someone lays it down at speed and it goes sliding down the street on its side!💥💥💥💥

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, techyiam said:

By the looks of it, I would say one of the best so far, albeit that it may bottom on the big hits, or very heavy riders. But for me, it looks like heaven.

They all bottom out, the “How” it bottoms out is now the big question. I hope they’ve learned from the others and put some thick rubber ring. The T4 seemed to got it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jon Wall said:

Linnea lin Veteran on Facebook has the video.  I don't know how to post it here 

https://www.facebook.com/linnea.lin.14/videos/391895296480891/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...