Jump to content

EUCs back on Amazon !?


AtlasP

Recommended Posts

It was my understanding that Amazon removed all EUCs back when they made the requirement that all hoverboards must be UL2272 certified (which of course no EUC by any of the currently active manufacturers is).

Not sure when exactly it happened, but it appears InMotion now has a dedicated Amazon shop where they are selling the V5F, V8F, and V11. (The V12 is also detailed on the shop page/presumably coming but doesn't seem to have an actual dedicated Amazon page yet.)

https://amazon.com/stores/page/0EC48C57-E5C5-4AE1-B864-47A52BDBD6C7

Takeaways/thoughts:

  • Given the range of issues exhibited by all EUC manufacturers, I can't imagine buying such a device directly from the manufacturer through Amazon versus from a trusted western distributor like ewheels, for the support and support turnaround time alone.
  • That said, of all manufacturers to begin approaching being ready for Amazon, it is no surprise that InMotion would be first/leading the way.
  • In the end I think EUCs being available through a household-name retailer such as Amazon could be good for the growth of the broader EUC community even though it would likely still be bad for individual consumers purchasing through Amazon rather than through a western distributor with better support.
Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plot thickens. It appears "InMotion Direct" on Amazon is actually registered out of Hong Kong?

Quote
  • Business Name:xiangganglexingyundongkejiyouxiangongsi
  • Business Address:
    • jiulongwangjiaomidundao610hao
    • helihuoshangyezhongxin1318-19shi
    • hongkong
    • hongkong
    • 999077
    • HK

[Source: Amazon.com Seller Profile: Inmotion Direct ]

 

So is this just a random reseller and not actually officially InMotion?

Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Schmudel said:

If you click on “details” and look on the right of the page it says “sold by Freemotion”.

That's in "Other Sellers". (For those not familiar with how Amazon works, there can be multiple sellers of the same item/listing.)

The main listing above that clearly states:

Ships from Inmotion Direct
Sold by Inmotion Direct
Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting, I just checked it again. If you select a US address for shipping it says inmotion direct, if you select a Canadian address it says Freemotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Schmudel said:

This is interesting, I just checked it again. If you select a US address for shipping it says inmotion direct, if you select a Canadian address it says Freemotion.

Oh I see, good catch. It still seems 'InMotion Direct' is the one that created/controls the main 'Amazon store' though and the root listing for each model, with Freemotion piggy-backing off that as an alternate seller for those listings. (Presumably the default seller waffles depending on which markets each of those sellers has selected to ship to or not.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

inmotion wheels have official UL and IP ratings though... i believe so do ninebots and anything from segway/ninebot, which were also sold on amazon but theyre out of the EUC game now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rywokast said:

inmotion wheels have official UL and IP ratings though... i believe so do ninebots and anything from segway/ninebot, which were also sold on amazon but theyre out of the EUC game now

This is false. See: https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/17309-up-to-date-euc-comparison-table/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-323377 . (That comment mostly talks about IP ratings, but it's a similar story for UL2272 rating--only a single EUC ever made was UL2272 rated, and that was the Ninebot One S1 [but NOT the One S2]. The certification is just too expensive and ultimately not worth it for such tiny companies. There is some discussion whether some of Ninebot's and/or InMotion's battery packs are UL rated and/or IP rated, but that's just one component and would not extend to the whole device.)

Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, AtlasP said:

This is false. See: https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/17309-up-to-date-euc-comparison-table/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-323377 . (That comment mostly talks about IP ratings, but it's a similar story for UL2272 rating--only a single EUC ever made was UL2272 rated, and that was the Ninebot One S1 [but NOT the One S2]. The certification is just too expensive and ultimately not worth it for such tiny companies. There is some discussion whether some of Ninebot's and/or InMotion's battery packs are UL-rated, but that's just one component and would not extend to the whole device.)

really? ive seen multiple sources claim that for them... but i cant even find any info or any sort of database for such ratings.... whos to say anyone couldnt just slap a sticker on it and say that lol, dont know why information about it is so vague.. smartwheel claims its cheap ass hoverboards are all UL certified https://www.smartwheel.ca/Smartboard-R8-65-Cool-Hoverboard-with-LED-Wheel-LED-Top-Bluetooth-Free-Bag_p_1937.html so dont know how expensive it could be? i would definitely believe their batteries are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Rywokast said:

really? ive seen multiple sources claim that for them... but i cant even find any info or any sort of database for such ratings.... whos to say anyone couldnt just slap a sticker on it and say that lol, dont know why information about it is so vague.. smartwheel claims its cheap ass hoverboards are all UL certified https://www.smartwheel.ca/Smartboard-R8-65-Cool-Hoverboard-with-LED-Wheel-LED-Top-Bluetooth-Free-Bag_p_1937.html so dont know how expensive it could be? i would definitely believe their batteries are

Edited: The numbers were actually even worse than I remembered in my first attempted response here. I found one of the source comments by Jason McNeil on the subject: https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/6954-v5fv8-ul-certification-safety-question/?tab=comments#comment-87760

Edited by AtlasP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, I wasn't aware of the UL2270 certification. Having read a little about it, I am not surprised that the current crop of EUC's don't have it. The drop tests alone would probably render any Gotway useless. I would think Inmotion and Kingsong would be the best current contenders, although I suspect the venerable old Z10 would probably pass it now if I'm honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Planemo said:

Interesting, I wasn't aware of the UL2270 certification. Having read a little about it, I am not surprised that the current crop of EUC's don't have it. The drop tests alone would probably render any Gotway useless. I would think Inmotion and Kingsong would be the best current contenders, although I suspect the venerable old Z10 would probably pass it now if I'm honest.

There's another comment by Jason where he explains that the UL2272 cert doesn't even support the size of batteries (technically total voltage) used in virtually all EUCs today. So to get an EUC certified, you'd actually have to petition for them to extend UL2272 to encompass larger batteries/higher voltages, or almost NO contemporary EUC could pass. Everything else is moot if that wasn't resolved first.

Edit: found it - https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/8518-help-all-lithium-ion-cycles-banned-at-usc/?tab=comments#comment-123703 . All bow to my google-fu. ;-) (To be clear, the speculation in that 2017 comment that the 14d/16s might become certified never actually happened.)

Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AtlasP said:

There's another comment by Jason where he explains that the UL2272 cert doesn't even support the size of batteries (technically total voltage) used in virtually all EUCs today.

Yep, 60v. So no surprise that the Z10 was designed at 58.8v then...

13 minutes ago, AtlasP said:

Edit: found it - https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/8518-help-all-lithium-ion-cycles-banned-at-usc/?tab=comments#comment-123703 . All bow to my google-fu. ;-) (To be clear, the speculation in that 2017 comment that the 14d/16s might become certified never actually happened.)

Interesting comment from Jason about having to get re-certified even if a change of cell was used in a particular model. That alone would be a bit of a nightmare too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Planemo said:

So no surprise that the Z10 was designed at 58.8v then...

Good call, I never put those 2 and 2 together for the Z10's voltage specifically. Although in the end the Z10/Z-series was never UL2272 certified. But it would make sense as a reason for their otherwise strange design choice there, if the cert was something they were considering during the design process (and after having gone through the cert process once already for the One S1).

Edited by AtlasP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AtlasP said:

There's another comment by Jason where he explains that the UL2272 cert doesn't even support the size of batteries (technically total voltage) used in virtually all EUCs today. So to get an EUC certified, you'd actually have to petition for them to extend UL2272 to encompass larger batteries/higher voltages, or almost NO contemporary EUC could pass. Everything else is moot if that wasn't resolved first.

Edit: found it - https://forum.electricunicycle.org/topic/8518-help-all-lithium-ion-cycles-banned-at-usc/?tab=comments#comment-123703 . All bow to my google-fu. ;-) (To be clear, the speculation in that 2017 comment that the 14d/16s might become certified never actually happened.)

hmmm, after reading that i now know that UL certification is ridiculous and never meant to be for advanced PEVs xD interesting.. i honestly had no clue clue before what it entailed, just that it was a type of safety certification for electronics.. yea thats never gonna happen lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/28/2021 at 8:43 PM, Rywokast said:

hmmm, after reading that i now know that UL certification is ridiculous and never meant to be for advanced PEVs xD interesting.. i honestly had no clue clue before what it entailed, just that it was a type of safety certification for electronics.. yea thats never gonna happen lol

It was pretty-clearly created as a knee-jerk response to the hoverboard fire scare, and myopically at that--without any anticipation of the broader PEV/micro-vehicle revolution we find ourselves in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...