Rehab1 Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 I finally pulled out my new Flame Edition NB! E+ for a ride. I made sure all of the settings were almost exact to my other NB1E+ which included roll and pitch calibrations, somatosensory settings (3), and tire pressures (40PSI). The Roll angle on the 'white' NB was very close .73 degrees (almost 0 degrees) and on the Flame NB edition is was 0 degrees. I then check the pedal fore and aft angles using a specialize tool for scoliosis called a scoliometer. Interestingly there was a huge difference in pedal angle degrees between the two. The white NB pedal angles measured 3 degrees' forward tilt' where the 'Flame' measured a backward or negative 1 1/2 degrees tilt. That is a difference of 4 1/2 degrees. On my initial ride yesterday of the Flame NB it felt really slow until I leaned way forward to pick up speed. The white NB is a gentle lean.I found this to be an interesting comparison. Are there any specific + or - error tolerances for the Pitch and Roll angles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSport Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 I have noticed that the forward and back calibration is not usually exactly accurate. You might need to calibrate a couple times to get it where you like it. Just my opinion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehab1 Posted July 12, 2016 Author Share Posted July 12, 2016 @SuperSportYes that is what I plan to do . I have referenced your video on manual calibration numerous times. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.