Jump to content

Rehab1´s accident(s)


Rehab1

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, WARPed1701D said:

Nice paint job. 

Not mine. Auto body shop and a local artist Pamela Shanteau. She actually played Star Trek music while painting the murals. 

If you look close you’ll see a 2 foot long ballast weight mounted on the right front skid. The 50 lb weight came loose during flight causing the pilot to loose control.

Edited by Rehab1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Rehab1 said:

Not mine. Auto body shop and a local artist Pamela Shanteau. She actually played Star Trek music while painting the murals. 

If you look close you’ll see a 2 foot long ballast weight mounted on the right front skid. The 50 lb weight came loose during flight causing the pilot to loose control.

Cool pictures, and helicopter.

Wow, losing that weight caused the crash and fatalities? Would good pilot skills allow that to have been a recoverable mechanical failure? If not, I would have welded the ballast to the skid.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Rehab1 said:

My bad. Let me clarify. The 50 lb ballast weight is strategically placed by the pilot depending if there is a passenger is onboard. Crazy right? Experimental aircraft is just that...experimental..

Pilot and passenger onboard requires that the ballast weight be placed aft of the cockpit in a predetermined location to ballance the CG . If only the pilot is onboard then the weight is placed on the left front skid (passenger side).

The weight cannot be welded in place being  you have to physically transfer the weight based on the 1/2 passenger payload. The lead weight is housed in a cylindrical container with a special security pin.  According to the accident report the aft ballast came loose during flight causing the tail boom to abruptly angle upwards striking the mainrotor blades. Pilot error as he missed an important section of the preflight check list.   

If interested, here is the detailed, somewhat gory details http://www.uzpln.cz/pdf/incident_JAGcQGH7.pdf

incident_JAGcQGH7.pdf

Thanks, makes sense. Never forget the check list.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://skywolverines.com/viewtopic.php?t=2016&p=26170

"Here is my guess .... and that is all it is is a guess

Safari has always had a low frequency vibration problem that transmits thru the fuselage and shows up in weird places like the tip of a skid which will bounce up and down in flight .... or a shake in the tailboom or somewhere else .... and my jaw would drop when the recommended solution was to strap a bag of lead shot to the skid to stop it from bouncing

There have been cases where the whole rotor system has broken off and departed the helicopter ... and killed the pilot and passenger .... the last one I think was an off duty sheriff and his wife out for an evening flight , 

I think it is because the 2-per-rev shake of the teetering rotor has no place to go .... the mast is too rigid ... so the shake shows up somewhere else in the fuselage"

Sounds kinda scary for Safari pilots.

14 hours ago, Rehab1 said:

Chopper started shaking violently so I dropped the collective which controls the blade pitch angle and autorotated

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Bob Eisenman said:

Sounds kinda scary for Safari pilots.

Pilots flying experimental aircraft, especially helicopters, have an increased risk of bodily injury or death. The QC standards are much greater for a commercial aircraft over an experimental version and the cost reflects it. I owned 2 Enstroms and a Bell 47 besides the 2 homebuilt helicopters.  I could perform my own maintenance including annuals on the experimentals which was a huge cost savings. Maintenance costs  on the 3 commercial ships was outrageous, but I never had to perform any unexpected emergency maneuvers in my 20 years of flying the commercial choppers.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rehab1 said:

Pilots flying experimental aircraft, especially helicopters, have an increased risk of bodily injury or death. The QC standards are much greater for a commercial aircraft over an experimental version and the cost reflects it. I owned 2 Enstroms and a Bell 47 besides the 2 homebuilt helicopters.  I could perform my own maintenance including annuals on the experimentals which was a huge cost savings. Maintenance costs  on the 3 commercial ships was outrageous, but I never had to perform any unexpected emergency maneuvers in my 20 years of flying the commercial choppers.

I worked as a CFI and commercial pilot (small piston twins) for a while.  I built my own ultralight airplane in my garage.  I eventually also owned and flew certified aerobatic aircraft Pitts S2B, Extra 200, and Extra 300.

2 engine failures in the ultralight, one on takeoff below 100 ft, successful landings in both cases.

Brake failure on landing in the certified Pitts S2B, that was scary but uneventful.

Aviation is dangerous, but there is NOTHING on earth that can match it for the thrills.

 

Edited by Pard
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pard said:

Aviation is dangerous, but there is NOTHING on earth that can match it for the thrills.

Disagree,  earth is precisely the worst thrill for the aviation ;)

Edited by Demargon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Pard said:

I worked as a CFI and commercial pilot (small piston twins) for a while.  I built my own ultralight airplane in my garage.  I eventually also owned and flew certified aerobatic aircraft Pitts S2B, Extra 200, and Extra 300.

2 engine failures in the ultralight, one on takeoff below 100 ft, successful landings in both cases.

Brake failure on landing in the certified Pitts S2B, that was scary but uneventful.

Aviation is dangerous, but there is NOTHING on earth that can match it for the thrills.

 

You advanced further than me. Commercial rating was my next goal. I was taking up film crews from local news stations and only charging for fuel so I wanted to obtain the commercial rating and starting making some money. The written test was complete but then I lost someone dear to my heart and it changed everything.

Your definitely a survivor and yes there is nothing in world that can match the thrills. They say once a pilot always a pilot but in my case it was easy to walk away.

6 hours ago, Pard said:

I hope you are healing well.  Forgot to include the most important part of the post! :)

 

 

4 hours ago, Pard said:

Outstanding work BTW!

 Many thanks times 2. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Rehab1 said:

Kids and parents are always asking me “What happened?”  or “ Did you slip on the ice?”  When I tell them I fell off an electric unicycle I always get these blank looks. Now I just point to my ACM.  :)

39595293384_fc8d93c434_b.jpg

 

38497710960_bb809daedb_b.jpg

 

That's so cool, you don't have to say a word.  Would work with bicycles,  motorcycles,  and skis also.  That's very creative, how did you make that?

Hoping you have a speedy recovery.

Edited by steve454
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2018 at 5:37 PM, Rehab1 said:

Pilots flying experimental aircraft, especially helicopters, have an increased risk of bodily injury or death. The QC standards are much greater for a commercial aircraft over an experimental version and the cost reflects it. I owned 2 Enstroms and a Bell 47 besides the 2 homebuilt helicopters.  I could perform my own maintenance including annuals on the experimentals which was a huge cost savings. Maintenance costs  on the 3 commercial ships was outrageous, but I never had to perform any unexpected emergency maneuvers in my 20 years of flying the commercial choppers.

85999.png

WBZ Boston takes off and returns to land on a skid. Hovering skills for sure !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rehab1 said:

Kids and parents are always asking me “What happened?”  or “ Did you slip on the ice?”  When I tell them I fell off an electric unicycle I always get these blank looks. Now I just point to my ACM.  :)

39595293384_fc8d93c434_b.jpg

 

38497710960_bb809daedb_b.jpg

 

This is so funny, and very cool. It's amazing how it looks like a little 3D model of the ACM. Very cool technique that you used. And you did it all with one arm :thumbup:

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Marty Backe said:

This is so funny, and very cool. It's amazing how it looks like a little 3D model of the ACM. Very cool technique that you used. And you did it all with one arm :thumbup:

Thanks Marty! I can still use my left hand in the sling so holding something is not too difficult. Amazing how you can learn to cope. Enjoy your loooong ride today and be safe!

Edited by Rehab1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bob Eisenman said:

I owned 2 Enstroms and a Bell 47 besides the 2 homebuilt helicopters

That is an incredible amount of investment for one person. 

At the Westover AFB (Massachusetts) airshow several years ago I saw a restored CH34 Choctaw which also flew a demo as part of the show. The radial piston engine sits below and forward of the pilot in the bulbous nose of the aircraft. The drive shaft to the MR extends beneath the cockpit and then up via universal like links to the MR. The engine has a unique sound when revved up.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_H-34

I sort of think of herd rustling ranchers or crop dusting farmers when I look at your owned helicopters.

Locally to my apartment I sometimes see an occasional Robinson (R22 , R44).

Many years ago on the wealthy stretch of properties on Marblehead Neck, abutting property owners signed a disagreement (due to high noise) with one home owner who used his property as a landing pad. 

A V22 Osprey landed on Boston Common several years ago. The prop wash downward was so strong that several limbs from trees that were passed over broke off.

I passed along Boston Common earlier, passing the Paul Revere (is buried here) Cemetery a block away.

86147.jpg

86151.jpg

I don't know if your Bell 47 was piston or turbine but on the subject of turbine engine crashes the AN-148 that crashed after takeoff in Moscow was found (flight recorder) to have departed without turning on the pitot tube warmers. Several minutes onto the flight the flight system displayed an large air speed variance from expected. After disengaging the flight control system the an-148 ultimately nose dived with the pilots uttering inarticulate grunts in the final moments.? 

 

 

Edited by Bob Eisenman
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/14/2018 at 3:11 PM, Rehab1 said:

Thank you!

Dan,

You might find it interesting that a Salem, MA native was Marine Corps One pilot for awhile

http://www.salemnews.com/archives/marine-one-pilot-is-salem-native/article_c97fffe8-3bae-5cbc-8b8b-2b64e862f0a3.html

The last name of the pilot is the same of the man who just sold the apartment building where I live. While he owned the building I asked the realtor in a text message if the pilot and he were related. The realtor did not respond to my text inquiry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...