Haakon hoelseter Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 Is there any difference between the Msuper v3 1600wh and the v3 1640wh except for the tiny difference in battery capacity? If not, why would they make such a pointless change to the Msuper? What i am mostly concerned with, is if there is any difference in speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meepmeepmayer Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 Where did you find the 1640 variant? Unless it's something new, ignore it, it is no longer available and was for China only. The 84V msupers (1300,1600) are 25% more powerful than the 67V (680,820). So the 1640/1680 Wh (not sure) would be 67V just with a bigger battery. I would not buy it (unless the price is really really good) because they were produced a long time ago, before Gotway improved some things that needed improving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haakon hoelseter Posted May 11, 2017 Author Share Posted May 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, meepmeepmayer said: Where did you find the 1640 variant? Unless it's something new, ignore it, it is no longer available and was for China only. The 84V msupers (1300,1600) are 25% more powerful than the 67V (680,820). So the 1640/1680 Wh (not sure) would be 67V just with a bigger battery. I would not buy it (unless the price is really really good) because they were produced a long time ago, before Gotway improved some things that needed improving. It is on the site E-wheels.no. They changed the name from Msuper v3 1600wh to the v3 1640wh yesterday. Maybe they made a mistake. I ordered a Msuper v3 1600 from that site last week and i was worried that i now would get the 1640version. But they also upped the price by like 500usd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meepmeepmayer Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 I can't explain it. You could ask them if the 1640 Wh is the 84V version, or what the battery configuration is, or if it is just an error on their site. -- The usual "1600" Wh with 84V is 6 * 20 cells * 3.5 Ah per cell * 3.7V = 1554 Wh so it makes no sense to call that 1640 Wh. The 67V comes out to (I believe, the closest I can get to 1640) 8 * 16 cells * 3.5 Ah per cell * 3.7V = 1657 Wh (which usually is rounded to 1680, or 1640 maybe?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meepmeepmayer Posted May 11, 2017 Share Posted May 11, 2017 I really think an error is most likely, but you could ask or just wait and see what you get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haakon hoelseter Posted May 11, 2017 Author Share Posted May 11, 2017 Just sent them an email asking this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.