Jump to content

Inmotion V12 HT board: "More durable MOS"


supercurio

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, fbhb said:

Even the much maligned S18 actually uses 12 TO-247 MOSFETS despite it's much lower performance threshold, as can be found on King Song's website:

KS-S18-18 inch series-King Song

Ah yeah, with the description of 4000W+ peak power.

On @Jack ex-KS's climbing V12 video, the peak recorded is 6500W+ with 12 smaller MOSFETs

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, onizukagto said:

I wonder why batch 1 hasn't failed yet?

 @supercurio has done an outstanding amount of work on this subject and he can confirm from his findings that some "batch 1" V12's have failed!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While batch 1 wasn't exactly immune to the problem, remember that the first batch was only 300 units. And it was the first batch. Most folks from line workers to QC to management pay closer attention to the first units off the line than they do after putting the same screws in the same holes for the thousandth time. Sure they're better at it, but attention to detail is challenging for everyone to maintain. The number of parts in incoming inspection gets larger, the pressure to meet the daily production goal gets higher, new people are added and trained. Lots of things evolve on the production line, and not all of them are beneficial to product quality.

If you are able to do it properly and a few balls bounce your way, the production rate scales without incident. More often though, you learn a lot about weaknesses in your design and purchasing and manufacturing and acceptance testing... and you fix the issues one by one. Rate production ensures that all of your tolerance stackups will get just outside of their worst case limits all at the same time—if you have enough margin everything is still good. If you don't, you have another problem solving "opportunity".

Edited by Tawpie
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, onizukagto said:

If it was a design fault, I wonder why [all V12's don't fail]

 For me, component variation is a rational explanation for the inconsistent failure rate...

On 1/4/2022 at 4:52 PM, RagingGrandpa said:

Bear in mind, there is always component variation...
Semiconductors are made by dissolving chemicals in other chemicals, to create conductive pathways. This chemical process cannot be perfectly repeatable, and so part-to-part variation of some amount is expected. The 'average' part likely exceeds the rated limits by a notable amount; but a few parts may end up right at these limits. Which would help explain a [20%?] failure rate for controllers of identical construction.

For the cutout issue: we should be honest about we know and don't know. There has not been a measurable cause of failure identified yet. The cause could be some additional thing, unrelated to the FET spec. But this out-of-spec part is concerning, in any case.

Edited by RagingGrandpa
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You cant' simply compare 100V mosfets with 100V battery and say "they are silly"
The driver of the motor is composed by a sort of H-bridge, revisited for the three phase contest, here it is a basic example

Spectacle-J21155.png

Each phase is driven by two mosfets, one on the positive side of power supply ad the other on the negative side, and the motor is on the middle of the bridge.
In this configuration, as they are connected in series to the load (the motor), each mosfet is sharing only half of the power supply, that is 50V, so a 100V mosfet is double the voltage it have to handle.
Without this, a 100V mosfet, running on a 100V power supply, will not wait for the Inmotion test to burn, but it will do very early.
I bet they are fighting with a stock of clone or fake mosfets than with a project issue.

Edited by digithom
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, digithom said:

In this configuration, as they are connected in series to the load (the motor), each mosfet is sharing only half of the power supply, that is 50V, so a 100V mosfet is double the voltage it have to handle.

Only if both of the mosfets are off.

The normal state of these 3 half bridges is that in one half bridge both mosfets are off and in the other two half bridges only one top side and one low side mosfet is on.

So at the two half bridges with the conducting mosfets the closed ones have to bear (almost) the full supply voltage.

So your following statement does not fit, too:

3 hours ago, digithom said:

Without this, a 100V mosfet, running on a 100V power supply, will not wait for the Inmotion test to burn, but it will do very early.

As these mosfets "withstand" continously almost 100.8V.

Reasons/design guides can be found in infineons app notes regarding these kind of mosfets and the avalanche energy they can withstand. Depending on the exact series and which app note they can be used in designs to withstand about 1.2-1.5 times the drain source breakdown voltage.

 

3 hours ago, digithom said:

I bet they are fighting with a stock of clone or fake mosfets than with a project issue.

Could be. Or just bad manufacturing if one sees pictures in reports of teardowns with how the mosfets were mounted on the heatsinks... :(

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, digithom said:

they are connected in series to the load (the motor), each mosfet is sharing only half of the power supply

Spectacle-J21155.png

Not during use.

A peak-voltage condition is as shown here, when one (or more) FET is active: 

On 12/21/2021 at 2:49 PM, RagingGrandpa said:

AM-JKLWkMpu_8_fU9Ph15eI8f8VNbwnXaESYB_gpPp1AkThPPIruXKfk1Ei8AMrnrTw13zi68SljdxrBuQbBnfw9q38zs0fHd-rBlOglDeKLbBhqN1UwtK1SZ06yXhc-1jbPjyKpg6sLdDHAfYKgcIM-HrGbcg=w1488-h902-no?authuser=0

it's a function of temperature... if you exceed 100.0V across the FET at room temperature, it starts exceeding 1mA of leakage current, rising hugely with every additional volt.

When the EUC is off, with no FETs driven, no harm- we don't have battery directly across any one FET.
But when the motor is active with a very full battery, it does seem that leakage could occur.

I think the FET will act with a zener behavior, dropping about 100V from the circuit and then passing the excess charge in an unlimited way.
It shouldn't be damaged instantly... just from the thermal overload that could result if nothing else limits that current.

Perhaps the design can tolerate it because:

  • motor commutation is a pulsing behavior, so no one FET will suffer the leakage current continuously, and
  • the FET (or at least, the silicon die inside the package) warms up quickly, so the first few moments of operation (and even the leakage current itself) may be enough dissipation to warm it up enough to raise the breakdown voltage, and
  • if there is any significant (forward) motor torque being driven, resistive losses (including battery sag) reduce the apparent voltage, reducing leakage.

The part is still 'outside of spec,' but practically speaking, a small occasional current leakage might not be destructive.

And even if it seems to work most of the time, I wouldn't want to stop suddenly with a cold, full-battery V12 riding down a hill, with outside-spec parts like that.
Additional margin in the design would be nice... even Gotway uses 125V-rated FETs.

.02

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2022 at 5:24 PM, RagingGrandpa said:

Not during use.

A peak-voltage condition is as shown here, when one (or more) FET is active: 

The condition you shown in the picture should never happen, FETs ar always driven in couple in crossing left and right side, most of times, the gate of the two mosfets are driven my a dedicated electronic so that is not possible to switch only one.
But we are supposing everything, we should talk looking at the real schematic diagram of the controller of V12, does anybody have it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, digithom said:

The condition you shown in the picture should never happen, FETs ar always driven in couple in crossing left and right side, most of times, the gate of the two mosfets are driven my a dedicated electronic so that is not possible to switch only one.

This post was not for general discussion about v12s inverter but how it can happen that almost the full 100.8V can drop over one mosfet.

Seemed to happen that only two instead of 3 h bridges were drawn - but that does not matter for this specific topic. One or three h-bridges would show exactly this same point.

1 hour ago, digithom said:

But we are supposing everything, we should talk looking at the real schematic diagram of the controller of V12, does anybody have it ?

Afaik this did not leak and got public. Chances are quite high that they use  three half bridges, 2-3 shunts for current measurement. And as they afaik use 12 mosfets there are always wo in parallel.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a post from a guy who had a V12 do well on the free spin test. He then changed his tired, hit a curb and bam, the controller went out. not sure if he damaged something during the tire install, the tire was too tight on the wheel so had added resistance, or just bound to happen due to a sudden bump.

now i'm considering selling my V12 despite passing the free spin test after 5 times. BTW, i know they said do the free spin test 10 times, but is it 10 times back to back or 10 times total? my back was killing me, so i had to stop at 5. i haven't since tried to do the test again.

so if InMotion has no plans to replace our current V12 controller, i may opt to sell the V12 or buy the V12-HT controller (assuming this works and has better rated MOSFETs with different part number).

Any idea what to expect?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tan Ho said:

BTW, i know they said do the free spin test 10 times, but is it 10 times back to back or 10 times total?

Check MADpack’s video where he reads and explains Inmotion’s answers to two dozen V12 mosfets issue questions:


If I understood him correctly, you let the wheel accelerate then yank back. That is one yank. You should do only two yanks in a row, then stop and put the wheel down once the tire stops spinning. Now you have done one serie of two yanks. Repeat this serie 10 times, so that you have done 2x10= 20 yanks in total.

 But more important than the exact amount of yanks is that you must do them correctly! Shoot yourself on a video as you do a few yanks and the deeply committed people here can tell you if you did it correctly.

 Not doing it correctly can also be the reason for the “guy”’s V12 failing even after a successful “test”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@mrelwood thanks! very helpful video! there were some confusion in regard to the term. so in the video, he said do 10 groups of tests. each group consists of the yank, brake, yank & then brake. i did do that but accelerated one more time to let it cutoff: yank-brake-yank-brake-yank.

sometimes it was difficult to do and i ended up yanking to cutoff sooner than i expected, so did not count that as a successful group. in total, i have done 5 successful groups out of probably a dozen attempts. looks like there is a brief stop between each group of tests.

so since i only successfully did 5 groups of tests, do i do another 5 or should i start over again with 10 groups in a roll?

it's a bit disheartening to hear that InMotion did not commit to swapping out the controller for the new controller with the improved MOSFETs.  :(

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inmotion is updating their app with a function that will show you if you are doing the tests correctly (I don't know when it's out).

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Tan Ho said:

Saw a post from a guy who had a V12 do well on the free spin test. He then changed his tired, hit a curb and bam, the controller went out. not sure if he damaged something during the tire install, the tire was too tight on the wheel so had added resistance, or just bound to happen due to a sudden bump.

now i'm considering selling my V12 despite passing the free spin test after 5 times. BTW, i know they said do the free spin test 10 times, but is it 10 times back to back or 10 times total? my back was killing me, so i had to stop at 5. i haven't since tried to do the test again.

so if InMotion has no plans to replace our current V12 controller, i may opt to sell the V12 or buy the V12-HT controller (assuming this works and has better rated MOSFETs with different part number).

Any idea what to expect?

This is very likely to be happening. There is no official announcement, but word of mouth from dealers has confirmed Inmotion is sending out the next revision of the boards in March (maybe April). Due to chip shortages across the industry, this date is actually pretty good. For comparison, it's going to take longer to receive my Ipad that I just ordered last week.

A recall is likely not happening, which means for owners of the previous gen board, they are out of pocket for the new board or just live with the uncertainty of the old board. If the wheel test through the APP is effective and we don't see evidence of more cutouts after passing the App test, then I can respect this decision of no recall from Inmotion.

Gotway regularly does unannounced updates (boards, bearings), and yet people still not only worship that brand but then go and spend hundreds/ more on aftermarket capacitors, fuses, BMS'/Custom batteries, shells, bumpers, bearing/bearing covers/waterproofing treatment, pedals, pedal hangers,..etc, because the stock wheel has so many damn flaws :eff01bbbfc:. You think Gotway did those updates for us? No they did it to make a known problem go away (a big enough problem that actually affected their profits).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, conecones said:

Gotway regularly does unannounced updates (boards, bearings), and yet people still not only worship that brand but then go and spend hundreds/ more on aftermarket capacitors, fuses, BMS'/Custom batteries, shells, bumpers, bearing/bearing covers/waterproofing treatment, pedals, pedal hangers,..etc,

Theres a difference though.

I just read of another V12 that passed the stress test, went on for another 700 miles then failed. It's sheer luck that the rider didn't break bones (or worse).

It's the whole uncertainty with the V12 that would make me never step foot on one until theres confirmation exactly what the problem is, or another board is thoroughly tested and supplied.

The difference is that the raft of things you listed above re GW don't generally lead to a faceplant if left untouched (bar the potential 900Wh pack fires).

As I said long ago, riding a V12 is like Russian Roulette. I can't believe people are doing it tbh, but I did read another post (which was replying to the failed one) where the rider said he was thinking of selling but had decided to 'risk it'. Fcuk that, a braver man than I.

I read that Inmotion can't provide serial numbers of which units are affected which I am saddened by - I expected more from them re production line management. Without that crucial information theres no way I would simply rely on the stress test when it has already proven to be inconclusive.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, conecones said:

This is very likely to be happening. There is no official announcement, but word of mouth from dealers has confirmed Inmotion is sending out the next revision of the boards in March (maybe April). Due to chip shortages across the industry, this date is actually pretty good. For comparison, it's going to take longer to receive my Ipad that I just ordered last week.

A recall is likely not happening, which means for owners of the previous gen board, they are out of pocket for the new board or just live with the uncertainty of the old board. If the wheel test through the APP is effective and we don't see evidence of more cutouts after passing the App test, then I can respect this decision of no recall from Inmotion.

Gotway regularly does unannounced updates (boards, bearings), and yet people still not only worship that brand but then go and spend hundreds/ more on aftermarket capacitors, fuses, BMS'/Custom batteries, shells, bumpers, bearing/bearing covers/waterproofing treatment, pedals, pedal hangers,..etc, because the stock wheel has so many damn flaws :eff01bbbfc:. You think Gotway did those updates for us? No they did it to make a known problem go away (a big enough problem that actually affected their profits).

that's great news that a new board is coming in March/April timeframe. but sucks that current V12 owners with working controllers are out of luck. i hope eWheels will allow me to pay a discounted price to send my V12 in for rework with a new controller board.

When will the InMotion app come out to do the app test? Is the test just to let us know if a particular spin group test is valid? So we're going to have to do the same 10 groups of free spin tests again?

Edited by Tan Ho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Planemo said:

Theres a difference though.

I just read of another V12 that passed the stress test, went on for another 700 miles then failed. It's sheer luck that the rider didn't break bones (or worse).

It's the whole uncertainty with the V12 that would make me never step foot on one until theres confirmation exactly what the problem is, or another board is thoroughly tested and supplied.

The difference is that the raft of things you listed above re GW don't generally lead to a faceplant if left untouched (bar the potential 900Wh pack fires).

As I said long ago, riding a V12 is like Russian Roulette. I can't believe people are doing it tbh, but I did read another post (which was replying to the failed one) where the rider said he was thinking of selling but had decided to 'risk it'. Fcuk that, a braver man than I.

I read that Inmotion can't provide serial numbers of which units are affected which I am saddened by - I expected more from them re production line management. Without that crucial information theres no way I would simply rely on the stress test when it has already proven to be inconclusive.

i was on that thread and said i'm thinking of selling my V12. i was surprised to hear the guy i was corresponding say he had considered it but decided to "risk it". that's just nuts. i'm about to be 50 next week and had dislocated my shoulder due to a 7mph pedal clip last year. can't afford to get hurt on avoidable potential hazards, like these flawed V12 controllers, or my wife may just take away my riding privileges. 

i'm going to email eWheels and see what my options are.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tan Ho said:

i'm going to email eWheels and see what my options are

Let us know the result if possible. I'm hitting over 400 miles on my wheel so far. I'd pay for half the cost to get a new controller. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@conecones please note that on the public cutout tracker, batch 1 represents 25% of the wheels affected.

@Nick McCutcheon also reported a cutout followed by burned MOSFET on an early production V12 EUCO got as demo wheel.

It's a common misconception, I believe initially driven by Inmotion that only some batch 2 V12 are affected, blaming bad components from Infineon in the process.

However the data which was collectively gathered contradicts this view.

I think you're right mentioning the many other board failures, some of which have been particularly harmful affecting Gotway wheels as well. I can't help but wonder if That Black Cobra's Monster Pro would have survived the type of stress test which were invented to identify the worst V12 units.

I know some will never even contemplate the idea, afraid of destroying a fine wheel but I would recommend anyone getting a new wheel (any manufacturer, any model) to try the same stress tests before riding.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...