Jump to content

What to do - Battery not charging to 100%


Chriull

Recommended Posts

  • Chriull pinned this topic
  • 1 month later...
45 minutes ago, RagingGrandpa said:

...

It is normal for different control boards, even of the same model EUC, to measure voltage (and therefore %SOC) slightly differently.

Because of this variable accuracy, one healthy Sherman may report 101V, and the next healthy Sherman report 99V, for the same battery on the same charger. 

Especially the Sherman seem to have no 100% range - so with charger and measurement inaccuracy it is seldom to get a sherman to 100%!

45 minutes ago, RagingGrandpa said:

The best way to confirm health of a battery pack is to monitor current flow during the end of the recharging cycle.

...

Monitoring it can be done in a number of ways:

...


 

Another possibility could be (never tried!) to watch the reported voltage in an app while disconecting the charger. With some internal resistance below 0.2Ohm (for many wheels?) and a voltage measurement resolution of 0.01V one should be able to "dedect" currents downto about 0.01/0.2=0.05A

Maybe an idea for charge currentdetection without any device?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 11:19 AM, Chriull said:

charge current detection without any device

I think Gotway-Begode is the only modern brand that doesn't report charging current to the app... so "watch the app" is a practical method for lots of EUCs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My V10f would not charge beyond 95% with the factory charger.  

I used my fast charger from ewheels and the wheel/battery pack would then charge to 100%.  I have no idea if the factory charger was faulty, it became dumpster food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Senior Coffee said:

My V10f would not charge beyond 95% with the factory charger.  

I used my fast charger from ewheels and the wheel/battery pack would then charge to 100%.  I have no idea if the factory charger was faulty, it became dumpster food.

Seems to be a point to add to my post - 100% is a range for all wheels but shermann.

Something like from 4.1125V to 4.2V per cell - no idea how the exact range is for Inmotion.

But misadjusted chargers delivering not enough voltage are not too uncommon.

... if you dare to mess with mains voltages - the charger can maybe be adjusted!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 4:19 PM, Chriull said:

Especially the Sherman seem to have no 100% range - so with charger and measurement inaccuracy it is seldom to get a sherman to 100%!

In one way it really bugs me that my Sherman will only show 98%/99.5v in EUCW, although I saw it hit 99.6v on the last charge.

Erides say it's OK, and Leaperkim also confirmed it as OK so I have comeback if it all goes wrong, but it still makes me uncomfortable! That said I do suffer from battery paranoia, in this case mainly because I am worrying about it getting balanced properly.

I am using the same charger as I used on my MSX (which always showed 100%), so I know it's bang on.

I think I am going to use a custom battery level and set 99.5v as 100% to help me stop worrying about it!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Planemo said:

think I am going to use a custom battery level and set 99.5v as 100% to help me stop worrying about it!

That is exactly what ks, gw and inmotion does - they declare some 98-99V and above as 100%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chriull said:

That is exactly what ks, gw and inmotion does - they declare some 98-99V and above as 100%

The difference being that in EUCW, my MSX would show 100.6v also...

Theres definately some weird stuff going on with the Shermans charging system, much unlike Gotway. For example the batts being charged via the board, and charged via the outputs as well rather than dedicated charge lines.

Out of curiosity, on the next full charge I am going to disconnect the batts straight after and compare readings to the wheel. I am sure the wheel reads lower (I hope so...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Planemo said:

The difference being that in EUCW, my MSX would show 100.6v also...

This is the next step of complexity entering the stage now - not only the charger is (can be) "misadjusted" - the internal voltage measurement has about the same innacuracy. Your MSX reporting 100.6V could see exactly  the same voltage as your sherman reporting 99.5V!

2 minutes ago, Planemo said:

Theres definately some weird stuff going on with the Shermans charging system, much unlike Gotway.

Just take it as a game of probabilities - take for every value +/-5% for every step like "generation", measurement, ... and look at the pisdible range of outcomes.

2 minutes ago, Planemo said:

For example the batts being charged via the board, and charged via the outputs as well rather than dedicated charge lines.

Afaik Sherman measures the charge current and can cut the charge input off. So as this "charge protection" happens at the motherboard there is no need for separete lines to and from the battery. Just somehow the reporting to the motherboard for single cell overvoltage.

This has the advantage that the "protection mosfets" for the charge input sit on the "well ventilated" motherboard instead within the plastic wrap on the bms...

2 minutes ago, Planemo said:

Out of curiosity, on the next full charge I am going to disconnect the batts straight after and compare readings to the wheel. I am sure the wheel reads lower (I hope so...)

:thumbup:

Great Solution - not worrying about rumours or nothing but creating facts by observation and deduction!

The only "allowed" difference with the same charger are some tenth of volts by different charge input protection curcuitry imho. If well designed not even this.

Next reason (after this above and innacurate mb measurement) for lower voltage would be imbalanced cells... :(

Such an assumption could be hardened by looking at the xhatge current - if charging is prematurely cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chriull said:

This is the next step of complexity entering the stage now - not only the charger is (can be) "misadjusted" - the internal voltage measurement has about the same innacuracy.

The charger is the same one I have used throughout on both the MSX and Sherman, so it rules out mis-adjustment. Also, I am using the same multimeter. Both show consistent readings. I also have a meter on the charger, everything shows 100.8v. I appreciate it may not be accurate, but it is at least consistent.

1 minute ago, Chriull said:

Your MSX reporting 100.6V could see exactly  the same voltage as your sherman reporting 99.5V!

Oh I agree. But it won't be until I check the batts on the Sherman when fully charged (and disconnected) will I have more data.

1 minute ago, Chriull said:

Just somehow the reporting to the motherboard for single cell overvoltage.

I presume that is what the single red wire is for. Either that or maybe comms with the other pack, but two (one for each side) feed into the board.

1 minute ago, Chriull said:

This has the advantage that the "protection mosfets" for the charge input sit on the "well ventilated" motherboard instead within the plastic wrap on the bms...

:thumbup:

Sounds good :)

1 minute ago, Chriull said:

Such an assumption could be hardened by looking at the xhatge current - if charging is prematurely cut off.

I actually set up the HS110 and sat around all day (because I needed to charge indoors due to WiFi) to log the charge data through EUCW. When it finally finished I found out that I hadn't pressed the button (with the plug icon) on the screen....I didn't know I had to :(

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2021 at 12:41 PM, Chriull said:

small packs everytime used downto the last bit and somehow charged inbetween could end their live very soon...

I don't seem to find a topic about fully charging and discharging in this forum.

I'm not specialist in the matter, but afaik, the understanding is, that the best way to keep the lithium ion battery healthy for longer is to NOT charge to 100% and never discharge to zero.

For a device for which the battery is so critical (literally) I would really like to hear what the competent people in this matters have to say.

Sorry if this comes off topic.

 

Sorry again, I found the topic, with Google. Seems that the search engine of the forum is not that good...

Anyways, disregard if you like :)

Edited by Aztek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aztek said:

I don't seem to find a topic about fully charging and discharging in this forum.

I'm not specialist in the matter, but afaik, the understanding is, that the best way to keep the lithium ion battery healthy for longer is to NOT charge to 100%

Individual cells, but not the battery. Balancing happens only when fully charged. Misbalanced batteries "destroy" individual cells.

4 hours ago, Aztek said:

and never discharge to zero.

+1. The cells with a bit less capacity as the others get discharged first and have below average voltages! So emptying the pack can lead to pushing the weakest cells down to dangerously low voltages degrading them even more.

Quote

Sorry again, I found the topic, with Google. Seems that the search engine of the forum is not that good...

Yes - if i don't really remember the topic name i prefer to search with "site:forum.electricunicycle.org [search words]" in google.

Quote

Anyways, disregard if you like :)

You had a question, a hypotesis and found the solution - why don't link it? ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aztek said:

I don't seem to find a topic about fully charging and discharging in this forum.

I'm not specialist in the matter, but afaik, the understanding is, that the best way to keep the lithium ion battery healthy for longer is to NOT charge to 100% and never discharge to zero.

For a device for which the battery is so critical (literally) I would really like to hear what the competent people in this matters have to say.

Sorry if this comes off topic.

 

Sorry again, I found the topic, with Google. Seems that the search engine of the forum is not that good...

Anyways, disregard if you like :)

It’s an important topic so it has been brought up many times. Here, here and here for example. This post sums it up well.

Short version: it’s safer (in our case) to balance often if not every time. Nothing to gain from going low except risk of weak cells falling off the cliff.

@Chriull This could have been a good sticky to have in « general » something like « charging: best practice » the question comes up often. I will try to write up a draft some day.

Edited by null
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chriull said:

Individual cells, but not the battery. Balancing happens only when fully charged. Misbalanced batteries "destroy" individual cells.

I admit I was completely ignorant about the pack configuration and the balancing.

Thank you for mentioning it!

Short consideration brings me to the conclusion that the best approach to the EUC battery pack would be:

  • Charge 100% and disconnect;
  • Drive shortly after;
  • If stored, charge around 70-80%;
  • Never drain to halt or too low like under 20%;
  • Do not obsess - the wheel will likely be gone before the pack deteriorates past the 80% mark.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Aztek said:

I admit I was completely ignorant about the pack configuration and the balancing.

Thank you for mentioning it!

No problem - this happened to the whole community when 80% charging came up years ago.

Until battery packs started dying more often prematurely...

59 minutes ago, Aztek said:

Short consideration brings me to the conclusion that the best approach to the EUC battery pack would be:

  • Charge 100% and disconnect;

No. 100% is already shown at ~4.1125V per cell in series. Even reaching 4.2V is only about 80-9x% charge...

Charge completion is determined by the (dropping) charge current. Roughly 50-60mA per parallel cell.

Or just once the green light starts..

59 minutes ago, Aztek said:
  • Drive shortly after;
  • If stored, charge around 70-80%;

Or 59. Does not matter to much? Afair some 3.5-3.6V is the equilibrium?

59 minutes ago, Aztek said:
  • Never drain to halt or too low like under 20%;

Never is a harsh word. I'd take the small degradation from one (low) times low discharged before carrying the wheel home ;)

59 minutes ago, Aztek said:
  • Do not obsess - the wheel will likely be gone before the pack deteriorates past the 80% mark.

+ have fun riding!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, null said:

yes, also: real 100% arrives only after about an hour and some after the charger goes green (about when the voltage stabilizes)

As you linked my post above 

I'm conviced charging after the green led is disadvantegous.

Even most chargers afaik show the green led to late.

But i have no idea if the effects could be serious enough that it would be worth to spend time discussing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

As you linked my post above 

I'm conviced charging after the green led is disadvantegous.

Even most chargers afaik show the green led to late.

But i have no idea if the effects could be serious enough that it would be worth to spend time discussing it.

My EUCs aren’t at final voltage when the LED turns green, only close to it. You did the final Amperage calculation for the Sherman once, about 0,6A: Between green LED and that it takes a good while.

Right now I’m stuck in a quarantine limbo, but I’ll share the numbers when I can.

Edited by null
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Aztek said:

The problem is, I just did 100% charge and the charger light never turned green, even over an hour after EUCworld showed 100% and 84.5V.

Which voltage is reported at the end when you feel it should turn green?

This is regarding a ks 16 xs? How many Wh?

Which time you waited while charging?

Euc world shows charge current?

The chargers red light stays on all the time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

Which voltage is reported at the end when you feel it should turn green?

84.5V, KS write the model should have max 84V.

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

This is regarding a ks 16 xs? How many Wh?

Yes, 16xs. 777Wh.

 

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

Which time you waited while charging?

I started from over 50% and, I don't know exactly, 3 hours, I think.

 

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

Euc world shows charge current?

Didn't pay attention to the current :(

9 hours ago, Chriull said:

The chargers red light stays on all the time?

Yes.

 

At the moment, while not connected to the charger since yesterday, it reports 84.3 -84.2V, and battery cirquit resistance 0.27 ohms.

Seems as the charger overcharges a bit and the BMS permits it?

Which I can watch for and disconnect before happening, but what about balancing? Does it happen in this case?

Or do KS state wrong max voltage after all: 

Rated Power: DC 74VTop Charging Voltage: DC 84V

Rated Capacit 777Wh

Smart BMS with balance, over charge, over current and short-circuit protection 

Is it known at what voltage the balancing happens, so I can monitor it and stop before overcharge?

Edited by Aztek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

84.5V, KS write the model should have max 84V.

My brothers ks18xl shows about this viltage too and runs wo any probs since years.

Seems to be just a measurement issue?

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

Yes, 16xs. 777Wh.

You know if this is 20s3p with 3.5Ah 18650 or 20s2p with 5Ah 21700?

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

started from over 50% and, I don't know exactly, 3 hours, I think.

As your battery has a bit more than 10Ah with some ?2A? charger 5 hours+ would be roughly needed. So 2.5+h for half a charge.

Depending on your charger you should have been near thr green light. Maybe bit more was needed?

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

Didn't pay attention to the current :(

You can try - if your wheel supports charge current logging in euc world (some ks16x do, depending on mb and fw version) that's a great way to look if the battery is fine!

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

Is it known at what voltage the balancing happens, so I can monitor it and stop before overcharge?

At 4.2V (+/-some 0.05V?) most likely. But this happens independendly for each cell so if the battery is perfectly balanced at (4.2V+/-0.05V)*20=84V+/-0.4V.

As soon as the pack is imbalanced it could be at many lower voltages.

3 hours ago, Aztek said:

Rated Power: DC 74V

That's nominal voltage. 3.7V per cell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chriull said:

My brothers ks18xl shows about this viltage too and runs wo any probs since years.

Seems to be just a measurement issue?

Same for both the 18XL that are around me, goes up to 84.5 with stock or third party charger. 16S the same, should be 67.2 but goes to 67.5/6.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, null said:

Same for both the 18XL that are around me, goes up to 84.5 with stock or third party charger. 16S the same, should be 67.2 but goes to 67.5/6.

The question is if this is a detrimental overcharge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...