Jump to content

pArmitage

Full Members
  • Content Count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

35 Excellent

About pArmitage

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Colorado, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. https://www.denverpost.com/2019/01/07/denver-dockless-scooter-rule-changes/ These rules apparently don't just apply to scooters. "This doesn’t apply to toy scooters. It’s only for single-rider, stand-up electric vehicles with top speeds up to 20 mph." Now, what to do about models of unicycle that go literally twice that fast... It's only a matter of time.
  2. Could you elaborate on this?
  3. Hey, all. Just wondering if anyone has any pictures of their mSupers's padding? I have the baby carriage padding and both tape and velcro strips, I'm just looking for advice and ideas. Thanks!
  4. The problem with that is that EPAMDs aren't allowed basically anywhere either in Colorado, and even have a speed limit no other vehicle has. Legally speaking, you can't ride a Segway down a sidewalk. But as I said, the Toy Vehicle classification is a stop-gap measure. A restrictive one, yes, but actually just as much so as EPAMDs, if not a little easier. Colorado law states that cities have the ability to make their own laws when it comes to EPAMDs and Toys, which has resulted in complete bans of certain vehicles in some cities. And Denver especially is notorious for banning or controlling all sorts of devices that are legal everywhere else in the state. Having a grey area might be fine for now, but again, as soon as that first collision happens, Denver-Metro is going to start banning them altogether, I guarantee it. I feel it would be best to work with the state in this regard than to work around them, especially when it ends up coming down to a cop's own judgement whether to allow or disallow something they are unfamiliar with. I am still committed to designing a specific EUC classification, based around maximum speed. The way I see it, either we help to make the definitions ourselves, or we let legislators eventually make them for us, likely after someone gets hurt, which won't work in our favor. Look at how "hoverboards" are banned in NYC, and heavily restricted in California state. In fact, there's a list: https://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/every-place-in-the-world-that-has-banned-hoverboards-1750187617
  5. Today, an associate of mine has taken the Electric Unicycle to the Colorado Department of Revenue/Department of Motor Vehicles, with the purpose of discussing bringing legislation making EUCs legal vehicles within the State of Colorado. This associate is also interested in becoming a reseller, but they won't be doing so until they know that buyers wouldn't be fined or whatnot for riding said vehicles. We hope to act as spokespeople for EUCs within Colorado, and later, the nation as a whole. We're just... not sure on how to proceed. So, I'm looking for opinions in how we should continue, especially considering that Colorado is voting pretty soon (November 7th). But first, let me talk about how the laws for "Vehicles with three or less wheels" work. Specifically, none of them have 'one' wheel, but... let me just get into it. Mind you, all of these questions are legal, meaning Colorado's DMV questions them for any vehicle. The definitions are coming from their own slideshow on definitions, as well as the laws provided within. This can be found at: http://slideplayer.com/slide/3158826/ Does your vehicle have three or less wheels in contact with the ground? Yeah, one. Does your vehicle have a device connected to the front wheel(s) for steering such as, but not limited to, handlebars? No. But notice how they put the S in parentheses. Eh? Ehhhhh? Is your vehicle 1. self-propelled and designed 2. primarily for travel on the public highway and 3.generally used to carry a person or persons? 1.Yes. 2.No. 3.Yes. Is your vehicle equipped with: An internal combustion engine with a cylinder capacity more than 50cc? OR An electric motor with an output of more than 4,476 watts? No. Is your vehicle equipped with pedals for human power? No. Is your vehicle equipped with a manual clutch? No. Is your vehicle equipped with an electric motor with an output of 750 watts or less? This is where it gets interesting. Some of the smaller wheels meet this, but the larger wheels don't. Does your vehicle reach a maximum top motor-powered speed of 20 MPH? Again, see above. Is your vehicle equipped with two tandem wheels? No. Is your vehicle equipped with two parallel wheels in the back of the vehicle with one front wheel? No, this is not a tricycle. Is your vehicle equipped with two parallel wheels in the back of the vehicle with one front wheel? No. Is your vehicle equipped with an electric motor with an output of 750 watts or less? No. Does your vehicle reach a maximum top motor-powered speed of 20 MPH? Another good question, because some can, and some can't. Is your vehicle equipped with two tandem wheels? Note: Tandem means one wheel behind the other in a single-file line. No. Is your vehicle equipped with two parallel wheels in the back of the vehicle with one front wheel? Example: A standard tricycle configuration No. Is your vehicle equipped with An internal combustion engine with a cylinder capacity of 50cc or less? OR An electric motor with an output of 750 watts of electricity or less? Almost a repeat of a previous question, some do, some don't. Are the wheels of your vehicle at least 14 inches in outside diameter? This one is easier to answer. EUCs are rarely smaller than 12". Is your vehicle equipped with 1. two parallel wheels and 2.self-balancing? 1. No 2. Yes Is your vehicle designed to transport only one person? Yes. Are the wheels of your vehicle less than 14 inches in outside diameter? Questionable. END. So, let's take a look at what the standard definitions are, for vehicles with three or less wheels, and cross out anything that a EUC doesn't meet. Also, I'll list the required legalities. Motorcycle: Has handlebars, Has less than 3 wheels, is not classified as a Low Power Scooter. Requires: Drivers license, title/registration, insurance No handlebars, no Motorcycle Low Power Scooter: Designed for use on roadways (?), no more than three wheels, no manual clutch, and either 50cc or 4476 W engine/motor. Requires: License, ID stamp, registration, insurance "Designed for use on roadways" is difficult for any EUC to meet, as low power scooters, or Mopeds, have a usual top speed of 30 mph (45 kmh), and have rear-view mirrors. Otherwise, even the Gotway Monster meets these requirements. Electric Bike: Pedals, less than 750 W motor, top speed of 25 mph (40 kmh), either two tandem wheels or two parallel wheels and a forward wheel. Requires: Nothing No pedals, no bike. Bicycle: Pedals, either two tandem wheels or two parallel wheels and a forward wheel with no wheel larger than 14 inches (35.56cm) Requires: Nothing Even if having two to three wheels is a straight requirement, only 14" or less wheels would qualify, and none of those would be street capable. Even the fastest non-18" wheel I can think of, the Gotway Tesla, is a 16" wheel. Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device (EPAMD): Self balancing, two parallel wheels, designed for one person, no more than 750 W motor. Requires: Nothing Again, it depends on whether having two wheels is a hard-and-fast rule, or whether it can be bent. Even then, only 14" wheels or less would have such small motors. And even then, many of those have 800 W motors. Toy Vehicle: Wheels no larger than 14" (35.56cm), not designed for roadways, Includes but is not limited to (gas-powered or electric powered vehicles commonly known as mini bikes, pocket bikes, kamikaze boards, go-peds, and stand-up scooters), does not include off-highway vehicles or snowmobiles. Requires: Nothing Most small wheels would fit this definition. The problem is that larger, 16" wheels and larger wouldn't. Therein lies the rub; Wheels 16" or larger cannot be defined by any of these definitions. Now, before I started studying Colorado law, I was going to put EUCs into two categories anyway; Toy and Small Vehicle. Now that I've done further investigation, I'm glad that the Toy Vehicle definition already exists, so those with the smaller classes of wheels already have legal precedent. Thus, the questions I want my associate to bring to the DMV are based around 16" and larger wheels. The way I see it, people use bikes all the time on roads that are mostly clear anyway, and will move to the side when a larger vehicle arrives. These sorts of roads are usually ~25-35 mph Speed Limit anyway. However, Low Power Scooters are allowed on streets 35 mph or less, and EPAMDs are not allowed on bike or pedestrian paths. I believe that this can be even more dangerous for EUC riders and others, as this would force the rider of a larger wheel to use a sidewalk, making it more likely for them to collide with a pedestrian, when a bike path (or an actual street) is available instead. (Which is of course solved by riding more slowly, but we're talking about legalities here.) CRS 42-4-1412 makes Electric Bikes and Mopeds follow the same rules as any other vehicle on the road, which I believe should be applied to larger wheels as well, if they are to be allowed to use the roads legally. I am okay with all EUCs being classified as Toy Vehicles for now, but I don't think that such a solution would be good for the community in general for very long. It only takes one lawsuit after a EUC-Pedestrian collision for the whole community to be demonized and the movement to be held down. And here's a personal anecdote from my associate. When they were about 13, they owned an electric scooter, top speed of ~12 mph (~19 kmh), when they were pulled over by a police officer. The cop told them, "You can't ride that on the sidewalk." Well, the scooter wasn't fast enough to ride on the street, but apparently too fast to be rode on the sidewalk? To which the cop replied, "I don't know, but you can't ride it here." Now, my associate still rode the scooter for the next two years before it broke down, but the fact remains, they could have been fined, arrested, etc. Of course, now, after this research, that scooter would have been classified as a Toy Vehicle, so the cop would have been wrong. Still, this is not something I want to have happen in my state, and something that I am willing to campaign for. So, there are most of my thoughts. Yours?
  6. Limited range means, for now, an attacker would have to be right next to you. My guess is that a model capable of having an effect from even ten feet away would be large enough to hamper the attacker's movement, making them an easier target for either identification and litigation, or an old fashioned, passionate butt-kicking.
  7. Let's not forget that the windshields of the original cars were made of glass more similar to windows. People in a lengthwise collision would crash part-way through the windshield, their head only, then when the car lashed backwards, the glass would literally decapitate them. There will be ups and downs, but as long as there is progress and accountability, innovation will continue to grow until these sorts of issues are a thing of the past. Gotway is willing to push the limits, Kingsong/Ninebot pull those limits back for safety. To me, there needs to be a good balance of both, and I believe we have that.
  8. Do they legislate the speed of e-bikes?
  9. How many people have died from segwaying off a cliff? Because unless that's some kind of epidemic, there's basically zero information on how that happened. I'll say this, though. If the cliff really looked like this: He perhaps didn't even realize he was that close to a cliff in the first place. If we're going to talk about dramatic posts: I'd vote for the one that essentially denies human mortality and agency. At the end of the day, we are all personally responsible for our own actions. Some of us wear full motorcycle gear. Some of us wear sneakers and sunglasses. Some of us love the leisurely stroll. Some of us skate on the edge of cutout. And Remember! We're ALL going to How we live our lives determine how we die, and how we are remembered after death. I feel it is only fitting that Mr. Heselden went out the way he did; He died doing something he loved so much that he gave it to everyone else.
  10. I'll give you that. I think the former is just local nerd slang, and the latter I think I just see as a word in my head. Similar to a word I learned in Pimpology 101, though I'll not repeat it. That said, might I throw in 'GizmoDuck'? Only Western 90's kids would get it, but they'd instantly understand.
  11. I use 'Yuuke', as in 'EUC' pronounced as its own word. The Star Wars AT-AT is often pronounced either as 'A T A T' or 'Att-Att', even in canon. BTW can be 'Bee-Tee-Dubs', OMG can be 'ohmaguh', LOL can be 'lawl', and I know at least one person who refers to the FBI as 'Phoebe'. I can also see the CIA being referred to as 'See ya', since if they ever come knocking, you'll likely never be seen again.
  12. pArmitage

    GotWay Monster

    Even if it's faster, I think I'll stick with the 18" wheel. I worry about traction, and weight when jumping. Plus, I see issues with the 18" wheel coming up every week. I'd prefer Gotway work on fixing those issues than innovate too much.
×
×
  • Create New...